Because the computer is capable of preserving digitally so much  information, it would seem logical to develop a means to transfer the  content from one source onto the next. Although the invention of the  disk had managed to accomplish this task, human nature would once again  become dissatisfied in the long run as usual. There was obviously a need  to transfer information with much greater efficiency, i.e. simpler and  quicker. With the introduction of the Internet, computers were able to  create networks; thus establishing the means that would provide such a  solution (for the time being, of course). A few types of commonly used  computer networks to name are the Personal Area Network (PAN), Local  Area Network (LAN), Wide Area Network (WAN), Campus Area Network (CAN;  utilizing interconnecting LANs) and the Metropolitan Area Network (MAN;  similar to the CAN, only the WAN is incorporated as well) among others.  As networks had been developing and catering to more and more  individuals, the results in their respective order were ranging for the  amounts they serve, from a single person, to a group of people, and to  an entire population. Because the library is a system that functions  like any other organization, such as a business office, it would seem  suitable and logical for a staff to attend their duties via a LAN, which  is the sort of network designed for that sort of a setting. Since the  library is often recognized as a powerhouse for sources of information,  the utilization of such a network should enable for the system more  efficient means to organize their materials. However, there will always  be circumstances beyond the control of the networks. For example, the  computer can always claim that a certain item is in their possession at a  certain location, and yet it cannot be found within the system, or at  least not in the particular area to which it was pointed earlier. This  is why there is the option of incorporating the Radio Frequency  Identifier (RFID) into libraries. How the technology works is that the  items are tagged with a computer chip and are retrieved with an antenna.  Through the use of this innovation, books that end up lost in the  shuffle or just about anywhere outside at random (perhaps misplaced by a  patron or even stolen by a thief) now have a greater chance of being  found by the library.
If I have not already done so  more openly, I would like to make a reference to “The World is Flat: A  Brief History of the Twenty-First Century” by Thomas L. Friedman. What I  am to explain is based what I could recollect from my readings since my  senior year as an undergrad. How the book got its title came from the  author’s comparison between the increase of networking and the  establishment of the playing field. In order for a field to be rendered  as playable, the area needs to be flattened. Once it has been flattened,  the field becomes an invitation for players and people who want to be  involved in the game are always welcome to play. A network functions in a  similar manner. Once it has been established, those who wish to be  involved are always invited to do so. As more people wanted to get  involved with the phenomenon, the network needed to expand so as to make  sure they received their opportunities as well. The situation appeared  as though the network was becoming one big game and the whole world just  wanted to play. In order for people all over the earth to be able to  play the game that has reached across the globe, the world needed to be  “flattened.” Compared to the Wikipedia articles on the “Local Area  Network” and “Computer Network,” and the Frank J. Klein video on “Common  Types of Computer Networks,” what Friedman had presented does indeed  seem like a promising future ahead of us. Putting the Karen Coyle  article on “Management of RFID in Libraries” into consideration,  Friedman is beginning to appear more naïve and delusional, since there  is a potential dark side he may have overlooked. No one can ever deny  what these networks are capable of accomplishing, but the possible  dilemma that the RFID is capable of imposing could be a real turn off.  Apart from the ethical issues, such as privacy, that the technology has  been raising, financial matters also seem to be a concern. Whether or  not Friedman’s dream of a “flat world” is possible, it is quite clear  that such an achievement would take tremendous time, effort, and money.  Even when other people are invited to and participating in the playing  field, there is no guarantee that they will enjoy the game (or at least  not on their terms); hence the expression: “You can lead a horse to  water, but you cannot make it drink.”
 
I liked your point about Friedman. I haven't read the book, but I've heard a lot about it. There have been a lot of people like him who praise technology as ushering in a new, great cybersociety. Their optimistic view can only hold as long as the cybersociety is described in simple terms. I think everything has its negative side, and we need to be conscious of that when we are using technology to interact with others. Libraries in particular are supposed to be "safe spaces" of a kind, and use of technology should, in my opinion, be as benevolent as possible. Unfortunately, RFID is sometimes the only thing preventing wide-scale theft of collection materials. Some libraries are forced to accept policies that aren't ideal in order to remain functional institutions.
ReplyDelete